This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the whole list) o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
Very KEWL, David! I got a chance to take a look this morning and, were I still teaching cartography, this would definitely become a reference for the class. On the other hand, I'm thinking similar efforts for other states would be great references for teaching "the geography of .......". I remember being frustrated when I was teaching Geography of the Pacific Northwest, I really wanted to use contemporaneous source materials for the early times when discussing the boundaries and various entities that appeared and disappeared along the way. Now it would actually be possible to do that. Thank you!!!! v ------------------------------------------------------------- Virginia R. Hetrick, here in sunny California Email: [email protected] "There is always hope." My fave: http://www.washington.edu/cambots/camera1_l.gif There's no place like: 34N 8' 25.40", 117W 58'5.36" if you can't be at: 48N 6' 59.9" 122W 59' 54.2" ------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. List Information: http://www.maphist.nl Maphist mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
