This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

There have been many earlier maps that present alternative depictions, or 
evolutions in the depictions of, a region. Without doing some foot work I can’t 
say whether any I know of declare the earlier depictions to be erroneous, but 
that is certainly the implication.

Do you want examples, or do you specifically seek maps that state that the 
earlier maps are erroneous in this and that respect, and that this particular 
map is correct?

Best,
— daan Strebe


On Apr 30, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Dyallen2 wrote:

> This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
> whole list)
> o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 
> 
> Dear MapHisters,
>  
> I recently came across on the David Rumsey site Alexander von Humboldt's 
> Carte de Fausses Positions de Mexico, Acapulco, Veracruz et du Pic d'Orizaba 
> (http://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/s/ebguwk), which appeared in his 
> 1811 atlas of New Spain.  This is the earliest example I have seen of a map 
> that attempts to display the errors in previous maps.  Does anyone know of 
> earlier examples, or is Humboldt's map a "first?"
>  
> David Allen
> Encinitas, CA
> _______________________________________________
> MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
> hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
> the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
> Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
> the views of the author.
> List Information: http://www.maphist.nl
> 
> Maphist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to