This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the whole list) o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
Thank you for this nice note. I am at present 'Searching for something not there ' in hte form of a hole in Herodotus' text at Book 4.36 "I laugh when I see that so many people have drawn maps of the world and noone has done it sensibly; they draw Ocean flowing around the world as perfectly circular as if from a pair of compasses ... " The hole in the text is metaphorical and hundreds of classicists have fallen down it as fast as Alice and whole worlds of Greek maps have been built upon it. . Susan PhD candidate, Classics The Australian National University ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. B. Post" <jbpo...@verizon.net> Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:39 am Subject: [MapHist] Two books To: maphist@geo.uu.nl > This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're > replying to the whole list) > o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + > o + o + o + > I am in the process of reading two books which have no direct bearing on the history of cartography, but might be of peripheral interest to some. Neither has an index so I can’t check to see if maps are mentioned specifically, but have to read the entire book. The first is PRICELESS by Robert Wittman (Broadway Paperbacks [Random house], 2010) and it deals with art theft. The theft of maps from institutions, private collections, and dealers is art theft even if maps may not seem to be as glamorous as Old Masters and tomb trinkets. The economics are similar whatever the object stolen happens to be. Good background into that world and inspiring because this is a story of recovered works. The second book is PARADISE LUST: SEARCHING FOR THE GARDEN OF EDEN by Brook Wilensky-Lanford (Grove Press, 2011). Eden, along with Atlantis and el Dorado, has been long sought, but never found. Searching for something not there might result in the accidental discovery of something which is, but that’s beside the point. I am of the school which thinks compilations of foolishness have a place in research by providing a “one stop to shop” for such ideas. So far in my reading, Wilensky-Lanford does a pretty good job giving the background for the various locations and something about the various champions of each idea. The endpaper map indicates the general locations discussed. As I noted, not central to the history of cartography, but not completely removed. JBP > _______________________________________________ > MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography > hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. > The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of > the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the > University of > Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any > responsibility for > the views of the author. > List Information: http://www.maphist.nl > > Maphist mailing list > Maphist@geo.uu.nl > http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
_______________________________________________ MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. List Information: http://www.maphist.nl Maphist mailing list Maphist@geo.uu.nl http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist