Hi all,

We are about to convert a large number of disperate data sets from their
various native co-ordinate systems into WGS84. The number of decimal places
we choose to use will have significant implications both in the resultant
data volume, and also on the accuracy of the data points stored. Any
potential positional error would of course be greater at the equater then at
the poles.

Does anyone know of a study into this issue that I can refer to so that I
may better understand the implications of what we are soon to attempt, or
has anyone been through a similar process and has real figures from which I
can base my decision? For example would it be prudent to convert the seconds
of arc to 1 or 2 decimal places?

Gareth Hardman
Hutchison3G




___________________________________________________________________
This communication contains  information which  is confidential and
may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient. If you are  not the intended recipient, please note that
any form of distribution, copying or  use of this  communication or
the information in it is strictly prohibited. If  you have received
this communication  in  error,  please  return  it  with  the title
"received in error"  to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  then  delete the
email and destroy any copies of it. Please contact our Helpdesk  on
01628765555 if you need assistance. Thank you for your cooperation.
___________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________________________________
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe MapInfo-L" in the message body.

Reply via email to