Jacques Paris wrote: > I do not know if it can be used to solve the problem but I have noticed that > patterns 3 to 8 are duplicated in the brush palette by others (22, 26, 29, > 24, 41, and 44), with a major difference: the first ones are MI hard coded > and are much better to print, they keep a nice space between "strokes". The > second series are bitmap defined and are much less effective for retaining > their clarity in printing. More details in > www.paris-pc-gis.com/mb_r/doc/doc_start.htm under "Brush patterns"
Yes, I know. I tried the mentioned patterns. They look the same as the first patterns inside mapinfo, but are printed with a terrible aliasing. > Could it be that this difference in definition is the source of the problem? Yes, I think, it's in fact a problem with vector fills in contrast to bitmap pattern fills. Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message number: 4386
