First off, yes the data came from a CD so that is why there are read-only
files in the workspace - but it seems that XP doesnt have that annoying
characteristic - which is nice.

I used my text search to find all the editable layers in all the map windows
and now the layout opens in all its glory.

thanks everyone,

Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacques Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris Gallagher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: MI-L Editable Layer


> Is your "e:\trak_maps|..." coming from a CD? It is often the case that
that
> file attribute is set to read only. If you can locate thet table, you can
> modify its attribute for all its components.
>
> Jacques Paris
> e-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MapBasic-MapInfo support  http://www.paris-pc-gis.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Gallagher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: December 11, 2002 08:04
> To: MapInfo List
> Subject: MI-L Editable Layer
>
> Hello there,
>
> I have inherited some old workspace files from a clitent which are not
> opeining. There appear to be two main reasons why this is happeningL
>
> 1) The old classic problems with the directory structures, drive letters
> being different (which I have managed to solve)
>
> and
>
> 2) it appears the layer in the workspace that is set to editable is now
> read-only and I get the following error
> "(e:\trak_maps\maps\rideau_system\trak sf to ottawa 7 and 9.wor:1411)
Layer
> is read-only and not editable"
>
> So my question to you fine MapInfoers is this "If I open the workspace in
> Notepad, where can I find out which layer is set to editable?" There are
72
> tables in this file so searching manualy without any direction would just
> take too long!
>
> Well, thanks alot,
>
> Chris
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 4497

Reply via email to