Juan:

There is an option in AutoCAD Map to export AutoCAD files to shape files with a check box to convert closed polylines to regions. I've tried it but had poor results because the parcels I was trying to import were made up of lines, not polylines, and definitely not closed.

The same data however was converted and reprojected into shape files with very good results. So with better tools, even bad data can be salvaged. If you find what the magic combination is, I would like to know.

Joe

At 01:52 PM 6/5/2003 -0700, you wrote:
I have import a map from AutoCAD 12 format. However
MapInfo reads the map as lines and not as Regions. Do
any body know if there is any way to turn the lines of
each polygon in a Region?, (to attaching later the
data of all each Regions in a browser) because the
function "convert to regions" do not seem  to have any
effect.
Or in any case, could any body that use AutoCAD tell
me how can I make each polygon a Region in that
package?

Thank you.

Juan Carlos Rodr�guez Mu�oz


__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 7176


Clean Email content brought to you by Ultraplix using Mailscanner For more information go to http://www.ultraplix.com/help.htm

Joseph Barreca Map Metrics 2109 Hwy 25 South Kettle Falls, WA 99141 509 738 6155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mapmet.com


Clean Email content brought to you by Ultraplix using Mailscanner For more information go to http://www.ultraplix.com/help.htm








---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 7189



Reply via email to