Cliff

Thanks for the insight on GDA94 and WGS84, and my apologies for
generalising the term projection - which is the way the earth is
presented as a flat surface (eg. on paper) for measuring. Datum's
represent the measuring system used.

However, I will jump over to your sight for the definitive word on the
difference between the two.

Greg Gainey

-----Original Message-----
From: Clifford J Mugnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, 29 May 2004 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MI-L Difference between projections GDA94 & WGS84





Greg,

For worldwide use, WGS84 is the preferred "standard." For all
non-defence
related GIS applications for all of Australia, the preferred "standard"
is
GDA94 because it is the legal standard for Australia.

Except for sub-centimeter level geodetic esoterica, the two are
identical.

Note that these are datums and are NOT projections. If you don't know
the
difference, read my stuff at the "ASPRS" website listed below my
signature
block.

Cliff Mugnier
Chief of Geodesy
CENTER FOR GEOINFORMATICS
Department of Civil Engineering
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Academic Office Voice and Facsimile: (225) 578-8536
Research Office Voice and Facsimile: (225) 578-4474
======================================================
http://www.ASPRS.org/resources.html
http://www.cee.lsu.edu/facultyStaff/mugnier/index.html
======================================================






Hi listers



Can anyone tell me the difference (geographically or other) between GDA
94 and WGS 84 map projections?

Is there a universal standard preferred?



Thanks

GG




---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 11956


---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 11959

Reply via email to