Ok, here's my stab in the dark at this one.

We're all assuming that the two results are "triangles" that are the same
shape, but they're not. The two triangular pieces of the puzzle have
different angles. The smaller (dark green) one has a gradient of 1: 2.5000
while the larger (red) one has a gradient of 1: 2.66667. So the top line of
the "triangles" when all the pieces are put together look straight - but in
reality we have a 4 sided or an 8 sided polygon. I have exacerbated these
angles to illustrate my point (see attached <solution.gif>).

Anyway, that's my theory and it makes my Monday a lot better to think I
solved it. I haven't actually measured any of this, but its good enough for
me.

Anyone care to agree or disagree?

Chris Perry
Systems Development CoOrdinator
Parks Victoria
Melbourne Australia
Ph: 613 9816 6800
Fax: 613 9816 9876
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: RichardDuncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 12 April 1999 11:52
To: Map Info
Subject: MI Area puzzle


Hi mappers:
Thought I'd get your Monday off to a good start.  Perhaps this explains
some of those region miscalculations?  Any comments?
Richard
--
BM�J

solution.gif

Reply via email to