as an alternative, you might seek out a printer who can use an EPS file.
then you can get an image any size you like at the printer's resolution. be
warned that printers get scared when they find out that mapinfo does not
provide a "preview" image in their EPS file. We usually do something at
letter sized first so they can see we know what we are doing.
>> We want to make several maps that are very large for our organization,
>> approx 24 * 36. Will bring a .tiff file to a printer to have them
printed.
>> How do I set up the frame to set up a .tiff file to print at a high
>> resolution and at the right size ready for the printer, say Kinkos or
>> somewhere. Either it can be a .tiff or eps.
>
>Stuart,
>
>Let me make two assumptions : 1- your maps are in layouts 2- you have MI 5
>
>In those conditions, MI will export layouts as whole windows of 24X36,
>whether they show in toto or in part on your screen.
>
>What you will get is an image that, if you define it at 120 ppi, will give
>you the exact size as the original. Forget about all the ppi definitions
>that you will see with different image editors/viewers, and also about MI
>might tell you. It is 120 ppi if you want to keep your scale.
>
>What image you will get is another story. Under the assumed conditions, you
>will get a "map" (in the image) that will be displaced and shrunk.
>Displacement means a different origin and different left and up margins.
>Shrinkage means that the actual map will be about 94% of the original. That
>compounds the effects on bottom and right margins and your "map" will be
>completely off-centered in the 24x36 page and off-scale of course.
>
>This is a "feature" that MI just recognized as "unexpected" no more than 2
>weeks ago. The hope they will be able to fix it ....
>
>
>If you want to increase the resolution, let us say you printer wants 300
>ppi, when you export your window, you may ask for a window size of 60x90.
>You will get your 300 pixels per inch when you reduce the print size to
>24x36. That makes for pretty hefty file. You may want to consider alternate
>format (png or wmf)
>
>But you face another problem, memory size. Before any export, MI create a
>virtual image that is holding every single pixel positions corresponding to
>the size of exported image at 120 ppi. It does that in memory I believe. I
>have not gotten confirmation from MI on that point, but no "contradiction";
>my 64Meg are good for about 400 sq.in. (4 letter size pages is ok, 5 no
>good).
>
>The MI problems that I have outlined can be expected with any export
format,
>wmf or raster. And we will be stuck with them for a while; I do not expect
>to see them solved with 5.5; beta is the same (MI was not even aware of the
>problem until late march), everything will depend upon the urgency that MI
>will bring in solving them.
>
>
>Sorry if I have discouraged you a little, but I took the opportunity to
>summarize a subject that has been central to my life for the last two/three
>weeks.
>
>Jacques Paris
>============================================================
>e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alternate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>gis activity (MapInfo mainly)
> http://www.total.net/~rparis/gisproducts.htm
>============================================================
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
>"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
