Hi Lucio, Thanks for the feedback.
So you are +1 as long as it is made the default behavior? I added the property in the xml ONLY to allow switching back to the behavior we have now. Does that sound okay? Dane On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:13 AM, kRAkEn/gORe wrote: > Hi list, > i find it perfect, cause most of the time you will end having your xml > mapfile besides your shape files, so you can move everything safely > (and kill those absolute paths that are killing the apps everytime you > move around things). > > +1 for applying this directly, BUT should be the default behaviour and > definately not use a property in the XML for enabling it ! > > cheers, > > Lucio > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Dane Springmeyer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dev, >> >> Anyone use relative paths in their XML mapfiles? >> >> I personally would use them more frequently if the relative paths >> found in the XML were interpreted as relative to the location of the >> XML file itself, rather than the script location actually calling >> load_map(). >> >> So, I've proposed a fix to make this possible, and to change the >> default behavior: >> >> http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/326 >> >> I'd like your feedback before applying to trunk in case I'm >> overlooking anything. >> >> Thanks, >> Dane >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapnik-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-devel >> _______________________________________________ Mapnik-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-devel
