Hi, What about to let PostGIS do the job and make a separate Openlayers overlay from the places where it finds self-intersections? They are usually simple to correct by hand. Nested shells are perhaps too mysterious for that.
-Jukka- > -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- > Lähettäjä: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Lähetetty: 3. marraskuuta 2008 12:54 > Vastaanottaja: Rahkonen Jukka > Kopio: Jon Burgess; Mapnik users mailing-list > Aihe: Re: [Mapnik-users] Nested coastline holes and Mapnik > rendering (solved) > > Ok, I can see it here too. Unfortunatly, there's absolutly no > clue as to what the actual problem is or what the solution > might be. It complains about ABA ways, which seems > unreasonable to me but the coastline checker already flags > those and people should go fix them. > > Self-intersection doesn't get detected by the coastline > checker, basically because I wouldn't have a clue how to identify it. > > Nested shells is a mystery to me. Some shapes gets it, some > don't. No idea why... > > Have a nice day, > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Rahkonen Jukka > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ah yes, that was my other question: you refer to > processed_a, but I > >> can't find a file of that name. Where did you get it? > > > > Sorry, the name is actully shoreline_a because I have been > following > > the Mapnik installation quide faithfully. I just > remembered the name > > wrong now. My own compurer is nine kilometers away form my > desk and I > > couldn't check it. > > > > -Jukka- > > > > > > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > _______________________________________________ Mapnik-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
