On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> >> I think #2 makes the most sense. From a developer perspective, MR2 is >> good stuff, there's no need for us to maintain two implementations in >> trunk/23 since we're already maintaining MR1 in the current releases. > > +1 > > Anyone feel otherwise? >
If we reach consensus, I can do this as part of merging MR-279 into trunk - which (see the email I sent out on merging) is a couple of weeks away. thanks, Arun
