On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> >> On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Eli Collins wrote: >> >>> >>> I think #2 makes the most sense. From a developer perspective, MR2 is >>> good stuff, there's no need for us to maintain two implementations in >>> trunk/23 since we're already maintaining MR1 in the current releases. >> >> +1 >> >> Anyone feel otherwise? >> > > If we reach consensus, I can do this as part of merging MR-279 into trunk - > which (see the email I sent out on merging) is a couple of weeks away. >
Combining with the MR2 merge makes sense to me. Aside from o.a.h.m.server, what would be removed? Seems like parts of src/contrib no longer apply (eg fs scheduler) and others (gridmix, raid) should be able to continue to work. Thanks, Eli
