Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests > have not been ported over to use them yet. > > --Bobby > > On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, "Eli Collins" <[email protected]> wrote: > > My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests > because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So the code is needed until > the tests can run against MR2 (not sure if there's an effort underway). > However, see MR-2736, if we remove the ability to run the daemons I don't > think we need to maintain eg the code for security patches. Ie seems like 23 > and trunk should be able to ignore the LTC fixes. > > Thanks, > Eli > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:22 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Has the community decided how long MRv1 will remain part of the codebase, >> after 0.23 ? The reason I am asking is, for those who are working on >> forward porting LinuxTaskController fixes (from 0.20.2xx) to 0.22, will >> they have to patch 0.23 and trunk as well ? Or should these branches be >> left alone ? >> >> - Milind >> >> --- >> Milind Bhandarkar >> Greenplum Labs, EMC >> (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and >> do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or >> present, the author might be affiliated with.) >> >> > >
