I couldn't find one so I filed MAPREDUCE-2955.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific. > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >> There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the >> tests have not been ported over to use them yet. >> >> --Bobby >> >> On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, "Eli Collins" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests >> because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So the code is needed until >> the tests can run against MR2 (not sure if there's an effort underway). >> However, see MR-2736, if we remove the ability to run the daemons I don't >> think we need to maintain eg the code for security patches. Ie seems like 23 >> and trunk should be able to ignore the LTC fixes. >> >> Thanks, >> Eli >> >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:22 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> Has the community decided how long MRv1 will remain part of the codebase, >>> after 0.23 ? The reason I am asking is, for those who are working on >>> forward porting LinuxTaskController fixes (from 0.20.2xx) to 0.22, will >>> they have to patch 0.23 and trunk as well ? Or should these branches be >>> left alone ? >>> >>> - Milind >>> >>> --- >>> Milind Bhandarkar >>> Greenplum Labs, EMC >>> (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and >>> do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or >>> present, the author might be affiliated with.) >>> >>> >> >> >
