[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15265651#comment-15265651
 ] 

Varun Saxena commented on MAPREDUCE-6688:
-----------------------------------------

[~sjlee0], I think we can just take a call on what the optimum value size can 
be(while keeping in mind that 10 async entities go together) as code has 
already been written for it. Breaking up entities this way should work for 1st 
milestone atleast.

If people have divergent views on the issue, we can raise a new JIRA to address 
those issue later, say make it configurable or handle it differently.
Also I would like [~gtCarrera9] to have a look as well because he suggested 
refactoring on MAPREDUCE-6424 and I have taken care of that in this JIRA.

> Store job configurations in Timeline Service v2
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-6688
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6688
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: applicationmaster
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Varun Saxena
>              Labels: yarn-2928-1st-milestone
>         Attachments: MAPREDUCE-6688-YARN-2928.01.patch, 
> YARN-3959-YARN-2928.01.patch
>
>
> We already have configuration field in HBase schema for application entity. 
> We need to make sure AM write it out when it get launched.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to