I'm sure that it is not so. If you look to the x and y values in the tirex-status you can see that they are divisible by 8, so that are metatiles. Our problem is more that we too often needs 5-10 minutes per metatiles.
Greetings Kolossos Thomas Ineichen schrieb: > Hi, > >> In some sense, yes ptolemy is performing much worse than yevaud in that >> ptolemy manages to render only something between 0 and 50 or so >> metatiles per minute whereas yeavaud achieves about 3 - 6 metatiles per >> second. However, the big question is is it doing something comparable? >> I.e. is it a problem that the OS / DB isn't tuned optimally, or is it >> simply doing something much harder? > > Looking at the Tirex-statistics for ptolemy the following question > comes to my mind: > > Does Tirex really render meta-tiles? > > It rather looks like every tile (256x256) is rendered on it's own. > According to Frederik, Yevaud renders a meta-tile of 8x8 'normal' > tiles per request. If so, that could explain a lot of the different > rendering output. > > > Regards, > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Maps-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l > _______________________________________________ Maps-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
