Steve That saves some work, but how long would you expect one that size to load? I have just realised (admittedly not looked at the data for a couple of years) that it is actually 170,000 records - takes about 20 secs to load - sound reasonable?
Chris On 2 September 2010 20:50, Lime, Steve D (DNR) <[email protected]>wrote: > That’s not that big a dataset. Probably faster from a local shapefile. > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Jackson > *Sent:* Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mapserver-users] Display performance > > > > Hi > > I wondered if anyone knew if displaying a 50,000 polygon dataset would be > significantly faster if called from a database rather than a spatially > indexed shapefile, or is it a similar overhead for both. > Thanks > Chris >
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
