Yes, you're right ! thanks a lot ! My projection (epsg dat) def file had some errors. I made some corrections on my proj espg dat files and it works fine with PROJECTION "init=epsg:3785" END Everywhere
Response times now make sense : +10% when projection's enabled (on a specific test tile) De : TC Haddad [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : mardi 4 décembre 2012 17:29 À : Clément MONIER Objet : Re: [mapserver-users] Projection takes less time than no projection ? Strange. Maybe you should check your proj EPSG code list and search for 3785 to see if it is listed there (maybe it is missing for some reason?). Or if it is in there, compare it to the defs below to look for any mistakes.... Tanya On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Clément MONIER <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I did try but it didn't give me the same map view (though requested with TILE=X+Y+Z) I don't know why, but (only in the new mapfile version) if I don't put a MAP projection block like this PROJECTION "proj=merc" "a=6378137" "b=6378137" "lat_ts=0.0" "lon_0=0.0" "x_0=0.0" "y_0=0" "k=1.0" "units=m" "nadgrids=@null" "no_defs" END Instead of PROJECTION "init=epsg:3785" END I don't get the same map's view De : TC Haddad [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Envoyé : mardi 4 décembre 2012 16:51 À : Clément MONIER Objet : Re: [mapserver-users] Projection takes less time than no projection ? did you try this option for comparison? MAP ... PROJECTION "init=epsg:3785" END ... LAYER ... PROJECTION "init=epsg:3785" END ... END ... END On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Clément MONIER <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: MAP ... PROJECTION "init=epsg:3785" END ... LAYER ... PROJECTION "init=epsg:4326" END ... END ... END
_______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
