Thomas: thanks for the info. The segfault you indicate below is solved with https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/commit/937dcb6857501835b5489fa4bea321105412a20b. So my testing below is based on 6.2.1 + https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/commit/937dcb6857501835b5489fa4bea321105412a20b.patch, thus introducing a new issue.
I've submitted a ticket at https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/issues/4668 From: thomas bonfort [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: June 18, 2013 11:32 AM To: Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] Cc: MapserverList OSGEO Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Python MapScript WxS Capabilities XML truncated Tom, I was able to reproduce a segfault using the CGI, here's the backtrace for the ticket I'm sure you'll open and hopefully fix :) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7b140af in msDumpLayer (map=0x604d90, lp=0x60d6b0, nVersion=66304, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", indent=0x616a80 " ", validated_language=0x0, grouplayer=0) at mapwms.c:2449 2449 if (l < lp2->numclasses) (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff7b140af in msDumpLayer (map=0x604d90, lp=0x60d6b0, nVersion=66304, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", indent=0x616a80 " ", validated_language=0x0, grouplayer=0) at mapwms.c:2449 #1 0x00007ffff7b14a67 in msWMSPrintNestedGroups (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, pabLayerProcessed=0x6164b0 "", index=0, level=4, nestedGroups=0x616820, numNestedGroups=0x616860, isUsedInNestedGroup=0x616880, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", validated_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:2619 #2 0x00007ffff7b14c26 in msWMSPrintNestedGroups (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, pabLayerProcessed=0x6164b0 "", index=0, level=3, nestedGroups=0x616820, numNestedGroups=0x616860, isUsedInNestedGroup=0x616880, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", validated_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:2644 #3 0x00007ffff7b14c26 in msWMSPrintNestedGroups (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, pabLayerProcessed=0x6164b0 "", index=0, level=2, nestedGroups=0x616820, numNestedGroups=0x616860, isUsedInNestedGroup=0x616880, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", validated_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:2644 #4 0x00007ffff7b14c26 in msWMSPrintNestedGroups (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, pabLayerProcessed=0x6164b0 "", index=0, level=1, nestedGroups=0x616820, numNestedGroups=0x616860, isUsedInNestedGroup=0x616880, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", validated_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:2644 #5 0x00007ffff7b14c26 in msWMSPrintNestedGroups (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, pabLayerProcessed=0x6164b0 "", index=0, level=0, nestedGroups=0x616820, numNestedGroups=0x616860, isUsedInNestedGroup=0x616880, script_url_encoded=0x616330 "http://foobar?", validated_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:2644 #6 0x00007ffff7b17c65 in msWMSGetCapabilities (map=0x604d90, nVersion=66304, req=0x6045c0, ows_request=0x7fffffffe7c0, requested_updatesequence=0x0, wms_exception_format=0x0, requested_language=0x0) at mapwms.c:3356 #7 0x00007ffff7b1d51d in msWMSDispatch (map=0x604d90, req=0x6045c0, ows_request=0x7fffffffe7c0, force_wms_mode=0) at mapwms.c:4833 #8 0x00007ffff7b4df6d in msOWSDispatch (map=0x604d90, request=0x6045c0, ows_mode=-1) at mapows.c:243 #9 0x00007ffff7b79c79 in msCGIDispatchRequest (mapserv=0x604380) at mapservutil.c:1607 #10 0x0000000000400f60 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe9a8) at mapserv.c:259 cheers, thomas On 18 June 2013 16:46, Kralidis,Tom [Ontario] <[email protected]> wrote: Hi: using 6.2.1 (Ubuntu) built from source along with the following patch at https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/commit/937dcb6857501835b5489fa4be a321105412a20b.patch, we have a requirement to implement a WxS MapScript approach for our OWS (we have up until now using the mapserv binary). All works well, except for WMS GetCapabilities responses. The result is a truncated WMS Capabilities XML which gets truncated when MapServer is printing out the root Layer element. I've posted a minimal mapfile and the Python mapscript at https://gist.github.com/tomkralidis/f70afd49270cb8efb62f. Observations: - commenting out LAYER.METADATA.wms_layer_group eliminates the issue, but we require this functionality - commenting out LAYER.CLASSGROUP and LAYER.CLASS.GROUP, and uncommenting LAYER.METADATA.wms_layer_group eliminates the issue, but we require this functionality - the same mapfile works just fine with mapserv binary Any suggestions? I'm wondering whether the Python SWIG implementation affects this. ..Tom _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
