Cubewerx supports it. But that's one of the very few (if not the only one).
Here in Europe the INSPIRE project's standards are most likely gonna be
based on WMS 1.3, so I am sure the demand for it will be growing eventually.
Best regards,
Bart
Andrew Larcombe wrote:
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
if someone wants to pay for it, but I'm personally so pissed off at
the WMS
RWG for this pointless churn that am unlikely to work on it for the joy
of supporting standards.
I'm with you there.
I don't know the other subtle issues.
If there is a demand for WMS 1.3.0 support (not much outcry so far) then
it would be helpful to collect funding to get DM Solutions or
MapGears to
implement it. Or someone else keen and trusted could do so.
I recently had a client who 'needed' a 1.3.0 WMS server solution.
Turns out they didn't actually 'need' any of the new facilities and
could settle for 1.1.1. At the time (~2 months ago?), I couldn't
actually find *any* servers that were supporting it. My guess is the
client just found out what the latest version # was and said "that's
what we need to go with". :(
Andrew
--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
http://www.osgis.nl
