I thought IONIC supported it as well; I can't see much who implement or comply with WMS 1.3.0 on the OGC pages:
http://www.opengeospatial.org/resources/?page=products&view=listbyspec&c onf=0&specid=97 > -----Original Message----- > From: UMN MapServer Users List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bart van > den Eijnden (OSGIS) > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] WMS 1.3.0 in MapServer? > > > Cubewerx supports it. But that's one of the very few (if not > the only one). > > Here in Europe the INSPIRE project's standards are most > likely gonna be > based on WMS 1.3, so I am sure the demand for it will be > growing eventually. > > Best regards, > Bart > > Andrew Larcombe wrote: > > > Frank Warmerdam wrote: > > > >> if someone wants to pay for it, but I'm personally so pissed off at > >> the WMS > >> RWG for this pointless churn that am unlikely to work on > it for the joy > >> of supporting standards. > > > > > > I'm with you there. > > > >> > >> I don't know the other subtle issues. > >> > >> If there is a demand for WMS 1.3.0 support (not much > outcry so far) > >> then it would be helpful to collect funding to get DM Solutions or > >> MapGears to implement it. Or someone else keen and > trusted could do > >> so. > > > > > > I recently had a client who 'needed' a 1.3.0 WMS server solution. > > Turns out they didn't actually 'need' any of the new facilities and > > could settle for 1.1.1. At the time (~2 months ago?), I couldn't > > actually find *any* servers that were supporting it. My > guess is the > > client just found out what the latest version # was and > said "that's > > what we need to go with". :( > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > -- > Bart van den Eijnden > OSGIS, Open Source GIS > http://www.osgis.nl >
