Hi,

Ok, thank you very much.

Is there any way to avoid what you said about the differences between the both sides of the motorways or not take account the direction of the links, at least for both sides of a motorway?

I mean, I need to calculate the Network bands for a distance of 25km to a selection set of nodes which are schools. When I calculate them, If in the edge of 25km I have a motorway the band at the right side (in the direction away from the source node) is correct but the left side of the motorway it's not included in the band, as you explained to me in the last e-mail.

But I would like that the band were in the left side too, because this is the side of the motorway to access to the school by car.

Thank you very much

Bye

El 13/06/2013 21:55, [email protected] escribió:

Hi:


The two distance should be the same.

When you click with the routing toolbox along a motorway for example, there may be a difference if your starting and ending locations are on different sides of the road. This is because the routing toolbox will have to use ramps and backtrack to reach the destination.

Maptitude Mapping Software <http://www.caliper.com>  Group Moderator


--- In [email protected], Juan Marín wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm a new Maptitude's user from Madrid, Spain. I'm taking my first steps
> with Maptitude and I want to ask you about the network bands.
>
> I'm working with the Spain Country Package and the streets layer. After
> doing the network bands (With the Lenght field as the cost to minimize)
> I analyzed them with the Shortest Path tool and I just realized that the
> results are not exactly the same.
>
> I mean, If I have a band of 30 km and I do the Shortest Path between the
> origin node to the end of the band in some cases I do not get exactly
> the 30 km. I've tried switching the parametres of the Shortest Path
> Routing between use local streets, highways or let Maptitude choose for me.
>
> Is this normal?
>
> Do the networks bands calculation have any diferent parameters to the
> Shortest path tool?
>
> I must say that in urban areas I get better results that in rural areas.
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Bye
>


Reply via email to