Hi Oliver, Looks nice. Could you add it to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/dashboard/ ? :-)
Just a thing I noticed without a deep understanding of the algorithm: Could there be a danger of the "average /= .... " line ever dividing by zero? Regarding your scrollbar requests: feel free to provide patches for improving Marble :-) Best Regards, Torsten -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: [Marble-devel] Improvements for climb/descend calculation routines Datum: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:42:48 +0200 Von: Oliver Haag <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Hi, I'm currently creating some cycling routes with Marble (Really awesome overall for this task! :)). One thing that I've found out is that the climb and descend height of the elevation profile aren't very accurate (Usually to large). I've modified the averaging algorithm to average over 200 meters (Probably another value would be even better, not sure) instead of 5 points (Those can be very close together or really far away from each other). This approach gives pretty good values for me so far. I've attached the patch for it to this mail, averageDistance specifies the distance the algorithms averages over in meters. Greetings, Oliver P.S.: If you specify many waypoints for your route the dock for the route gets really large vertically - would be nice to have a scrollbar there :) _______________________________________________ Marble-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/marble-devel
