>This is generally true, but think send a feedback report on SPF Pass >without a valid DKIM signature could be useful to answer the question >"Let me know about stuff coming out of my IP space that isn't DKIM >signed". This is a real question I know is getting asked. It might be >useful to have a standardized way to ask and answer it.
But how often is it asked outside the context of setting up an FBL? If you're already making private arrangements between the sender and the recipient, you can handle the policy stuff out of line. The reason to put it in the protocol is to say "Hey, world! I want you to run this complex state machine to decide when to send me stuff that I might or might not accept!" That doesn't seem very useful to me. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
