In <CAC4RtVAag5AKG-jRsyQujNCVMCa7S1n8bjsW=mp+3c3nfai...@mail.gmail.com>, on 07/06/2011 at 06:19 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> said:
>To: [email protected] >Cc: Message Abuse Report Format working group <[email protected]> Please don't do that. One copy is sufficient. >So, in terms of Murray's message (see below), which arrangement are >you agreeing with? Neither. I'm agreeing with moving details specific to particular authentication messages into drafts other than the main draft or into a registry[1] maintained by IETF or IANA. That imples that - authfailure-report modifies ARF - dkim-reporting refers to but does not modify authfailure-report - spf-reporting refers to but does not modify authfailure-report [1] In particular, the two IANA registries mentioned in section 6 of RFC 5965 -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
