>>Which of the following, if any, is correct? > >>A The ARF extension will gain in comprehensibility by removing >> any method-specific detail. > > That would be my preference.
So, in terms of Murray's message (see below), which arrangement are you agreeing with? Barry Murray said... > Ignoring redaction for the moment, what we have now is: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP > - spf-reporting modifies SPF > > That seems nice and clean. Your proposal changes it to: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP, and also modifies authfailure- > report > - spf-reporting modifies SPF, and also modifies authfailure-report > > At a glance the first method seems cleaner to me. On the other hand, the > latter is a more clear demonstration of how future email authentication > methods will need to create reporting hooks. > > What do others think? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
