> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony > Hansen > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:20 PM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: Re: [marf] FW: Feedback on: ARF feedback type Virus/_report > subdomain > > I definitely understand the concerns of passing around the malware via > email. If we feel that they *must* be sent, we *could* encrypt the > attachment (pick your poison, such as AES), and include the password in > another header.
<participant> I'm less concerned about it. An FBL is typically addressed to a person or a piece of software specifically equipped to handle abusive email, usually by prior arrangement. It's not like the FBL mail containing a piece of malware is being sent scattershot at people that aren't prepared to receive it. </participant> _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
