>I'm less concerned about it. An FBL is typically addressed to a >person or a piece of software specifically equipped to handle abusive >email, usually by prior arrangement.
That's pretty much what I was going to say. If you're not prepared for people to send back whatever crud you send out, you have a pretty poor excuse for a feedback loop. Also, I can tell you from experience that I've been sending lightly denatured virus reports (the first few bytes of the base64 changed to xxx so it's not executable), and I've never gotten into a loop or anything else particularly bad. The worst that happened was that a rather dim BL operator insisted that I was sending viruses because their virus detectors said so. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
