A major US ISP has started using the existence of ARF as an excuse to reject all spam complaints to their abuse@ alias, instead saying that they refuse to accept any reports of abuse in any format other than ARF - meaning that typical users have no way to report the (large amounts of) abusive mail they emit.
It strikes me that using ARF as a scapegoat for antisocial behaviour of this sort is not going to do ARF's reputation much good, especially if other abuse-friendly ISPs pick up on the idea. Is there anything "we" can do about it, such as putting a policy statement somewhere? Should we? Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
