> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Steve Atkins > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 10:27 AM > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > Subject: Re: [marf] Misuse of ARF by spam-friendly ISPs > > > Some formal or informal chat or action > > on best MARF practices in MAAWG is also be a possibility. > > That too, yes. I was more thinking along the lines of "us" being > clear that ARF is not intended as a replacement for manual reports, > rather a useful additional format primarily for machine-to-machine > communication.
I wonder if this could be mentioned in the BCP effort we're doing (JD?). Failing that, if we decide to update the base document given the recent flurry of input, this could certainly go in there. But it's too early to make that call, I think. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
