> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 2:33 AM > To: Zoltan Ordogh > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-00.txt > > Hi Zoltan, > thank you so much for a long awaited IMAP extension!! > > On 26/Aug/11 21:39, Zoltan Ordogh wrote: > > MARF is a good candidate, but I was not sure about the attendance > > of IMAP experts. So, I left it as an individual draft for now. > > I think reporting mechanisms are the meat and potatoes of MARF. I > wish this draft be adopted by this WG.
A co-chair moment, brought to you by the letters R, F and C: Handling an IMAP extension to enable browsers to do abuse reporting is outside of our current charter. We would have to re-charter to include this work in order to adopt it as a working group item. We do have in our charter the work of tracking SpamRep, but this didn't come out of the SpamRep WG at OMA. That's not impossible, of course, but it means discussion of adopting this now is premature. If there are others in this group that feel this is worth the exercise of re-chartering and (most importantly) are willing to put time into editing the document and creating and testing implementations, please say so. -MSK, as co-chair _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
