On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > If there are others in this group that feel this is worth the exercise of > re-chartering and (most importantly) are willing to put time into editing the > document and creating and testing implementations, please say so.
I think it's extremely relevant and plan to keep an eye on the work, but it sounds to me as if most of the eventual software development effort will involve IMAP rather than MARF, so I'd think the IMAP WG (if it still exists) would be a more appropriate location. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
