Actually, in going back through the list, I found this: > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt > > Also in Section 3.3, for "granularity", we might want to mention that > this is supported in [OLD-DKIM] but not in [DKIM] since it's undergoing > update now and the whole concept of key granularity has been removed. > We would then change the existing [DKIM] reference to [OLD-DKIM], and > add one called [DKIM] that points to the one that's currently in the > RFC editor queue. (Barry, check my math on this one, please.)
It looks like this one got missed. Anyone have any particular comments, especially Barry? > If there's no other feedback, do people think we're ready to start a > WGLC on this one? Re-asking this. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
