> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:59 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt > > I thought I'd replied to this before, but I guess not. > Do we really want to talk about "old-dkim" at this point? Shouldn't > we have a failure reason of "other" anyway, and just eliminate > "granularity" and say that any other failure reason is reported as > "other"?
I'd be fine with removing it as "overtaken by events". > Let's say that this now officially starts working-group last call on > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-02 ( > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report ), said > last call to end on 30 September. Everyone, please review this > version and give it a yay or nay. Please post issues, and also post > notes that you've reviewed this version and it's ready to go. Reviewed, ready to go. <chair> The datatracker will show this WGLC closing 9/27, but we'll let it roll the extra three days. I'll also take this one up as document shepherd. </chair> -MSK, as participant, except as noted _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
