>NB: I'm not implying Mr. abuse.net has to be happy of doing such >business. It is just a possibility that you and/or someone else >might put to work.
Sigh. I understand this to mean that you're volunteering to deal with all of the random support requests to abuse.net. >The point is that the feedback generator has to be aware of that >forwarding, in order to trust sending reports there. Sorry, that's 100% totally wrong. The feedback generator sends reports related to example.com to [email protected] or [email protected] or some other example.com address. Then example.com forwards the reports somewhere, perhaps to an internal ticketing system or to an outsourced abuse desk, or whatever. That's invisible to the people sending the reports. There's a whole separate issue of how much you trust a domain in various ways, perhaps including how much you trust them to handle abuse reports, but we have a separate WG down the virtual hall for that. >As an alternative to inventing more mechanisms, we could tweak VBR. tweak VBR == inventing more mechanisms. Please, no. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
