On 10/Oct/11 19:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > B.1. Example Use of ARF Extension Headers > > What was the reason for replacing the example that was there?
IMHO, the example in -03 is better than the previous one. It would be useful to see also examples with DNS records. > The Received-SPF line isn't properly wrapped. Also since SPF is > planning to switch to > Authentication-Results, it should possibly be removed as it's redundant > to the line > below it anyway. The Authentication-Results is also badly wrapped. > Everyone else that weighed in, please review the new version and comment. The Auth-Failure field is missing from feedback-report. Authentication-Results is also missing from feedback-record, which might be alright since it is already in rfc822-headers. The spec in section 3.1 does not agree with this reasoning, though. (And the User-Agent's /version looks different than Version:) _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
