On 13/Oct/11 08:24, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > The other idea I had borrows from a MIME extension: > > Authentication-Results*0: ... > DKIM-Domain*0: ... > DKIM-Selector*0: ... > > Authentication-Results*1: ... > DKIM-Domain*1: ... > DKIM-Selector*1: ...
If we stick to the "exactly one" A-R record, why would we need more fields? Each "resinfo" line already has all the information we need, already correctly grouped --except for selectors, we miss header.s if we don't want to retrieve s= from the third part, in the signature having the corresponding header.b. The only other data is the TXT RRs the verifier found. We ought to devise a format that allows as many of these as needed, with each repeated field including the query as well. It'd be a nuisance to require different formatting according to the purpose of each RFC 1035 packet. jm2c _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
