On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:28 PM, [email protected] wrote: > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-marf-redaction-01.txt has been successfully > submitted by J.D. Falk and posted to the IETF repository.
This is identical to -00, which expired a week or so ago (oops.) It seems like most of the objections/concerns regarding this draft have focused on section 2, the Recommended Practice. I'm not in a position to effectively defend that section; like the rest of the draft, it was copied from draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting when that document was split. I'd hoped that other Recommended Practices might be added to the draft, but none have been offered thus far. So...should we remove section 2 entirely? If the consensus is to keep it, perhaps someone more familiar with that specific method could take over authorship of the draft. -- J.D. Falk the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
