> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J.D. > Falk > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:37 PM > To: ARF mailing list > Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification for > draft-ietf-marf-redaction-01.txt > > It seems like most of the objections/concerns regarding this draft have > focused on section 2, the Recommended Practice. I'm not in a position > to effectively defend that section; like the rest of the draft, it was > copied from draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting when that document was > split. > > I'd hoped that other Recommended Practices might be added to the draft, > but none have been offered thus far. > > So...should we remove section 2 entirely? If the consensus is to keep > it, perhaps someone more familiar with that specific method could take > over authorship of the draft.
I must've missed it. What are the arguments with what Section 2 says, and/or what other alternatives have been proposed? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
