On 30.10.2011 23:05, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Shmuel Metz
>> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2011 2:19 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [marf] draft-jdfalk-marf-redaction
>>
>>> "atoms" in the ABNF sense?
>>
>> Presumably in either[1] the RFC 5321 or the RFC 5322 sense:
>
> Yes, I know what "atoms" means, but I don't understand why it would be
> appropriate to require that one redact each atom individually. That's why
> I'm asking.
IIRC, I was trying to make sense of
2. Identify string(s) (such as local-parts of email addresses) in a
message that need to be redacted. Call this the "private data".
It is the most difficult part of the task. Doing it too liberally may make
the whole header unusable, and redacting each atom individually is an easy
criterion to avoid that. (Well, it looks easy to specify, at least.)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
