> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 11:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] draft-jdfalk-marf-redaction > > IIRC, I was trying to make sense of > > 2. Identify string(s) (such as local-parts of email addresses) in a > message that need to be redacted. Call this the "private data". > > It is the most difficult part of the task. Doing it too liberally may make > the whole header unusable, and redacting each atom individually is an easy > criterion to avoid that. (Well, it looks easy to specify, at least.)
Possibly, but since "[email protected]" consists of four atoms, you end up with something like this if you want to encode an email address: [redacted-encoding1][redacted-encoding2][redacted-encoding3][redacted-encoding4] That seems excessive. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
