This is a call for comments about draft-ietf-marf-as, and specifically for review of RFC6449.
The main question: Does the working group completely agree with what's in RFC6449 (which is essentially a product of MAAWG and not the EITF), or do we have any supplementary (even conflicting) operational experience or advice for the community? This is what will go in an applicability statement. Either way, please comment on this thread. The replies here will feed input to draft-ietf-marf-as. Also, the document unfortunately needs a new editor. If anyone is interested, please speak up. -MSK, as co-chair
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
