On 07/Dec/11 21:01, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > This is a call for comments about draft-ietf-marf-as, and specifically > for review of RFC6449. > > The main question: Does the working group completely agree with what’s > in RFC6449 (which is essentially a product of MAAWG and not the EITF), > or do we have any supplementary (even conflicting) operational > experience or advice for the community? This is what will go in an > applicability statement.
I have some opinions on spam reporting, but not much experience since such mechanisms are either new or only for huge mailbox providers. I wrote some stuff in draft-vesely-marf-abuse-reporting, which I'd merge with JD's work if there's consensus on that. > Also, the document unfortunately needs a new editor. If anyone is > interested, please speak up. I'd be willing to do that. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
