On 15/Dec/11 23:06, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > We aren't defining a whole new report format here. We're defining > a new report type that has a few new fields but otherwise has the > same format as any other ARF message. And the new report type > itself is referenced in an existing field. It's all about fields. > > But if it will get us to publication, how about calling it "ARF > Extension for Authentication Failure Reporting"?
Sounds great! Indeed, as a new type it will have its own semantics, usage, and FBL-setup criteria, albeit we don't want/merit to specify them. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
