> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Murray S. Kucherawy
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:08 AM
> To: Message Abuse Report Format working group
> Subject: Re: [marf] DISCUSS on draft-ietf-marf-redaction-04
> 
> Pete, do you think this approach would fly?

Stephen, Barry and I like the proposed changes visible now at 
http://www.blackops.org/~msk/marf.html.  This would clear the discuss and allow 
publication as long as Pete also agrees.

MARF participants, please review this and provide any feedback, including 
support or requested changes.  I'll post it Monday morning unless I hear some 
objection.

I need to adjust the bit around the mention of encoding non-ASCII stuff because 
it might also be necessary to base64-encode redacted data if the redacted form 
includes spaces, but that's a very minor change.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to