On Friday, January 20, 2012 03:08:33 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Murray S. Kucherawy > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:08 AM > > To: Message Abuse Report Format working group > > Subject: Re: [marf] DISCUSS on draft-ietf-marf-redaction-04 > > > > Pete, do you think this approach would fly? > > Stephen, Barry and I like the proposed changes visible now at > http://www.blackops.org/~msk/marf.html. This would clear the discuss and > allow publication as long as Pete also agrees. > > MARF participants, please review this and provide any feedback, including > support or requested changes. I'll post it Monday morning unless I hear > some objection. > > I need to adjust the bit around the mention of encoding non-ASCII stuff > because it might also be necessary to base64-encode redacted data if the > redacted form includes spaces, but that's a very minor change.
Seems reasonable to me. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
