In
<CALaySJ+J1whbpmWZ4NCZoun2i2JAsGn=6wbcsuwb33mqg8o...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 01/22/2012
   at 09:38 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> said:

>Even many DISCUSS comments are resolved with what will clearly be
>non-controversial edits,

A procedural question: is it necessary for multiple WG members to
respond with "+1" to avoid an assumption of lack of interest? I tend
to post only in response to drafts that I consider problematical or to
issues that others have raised.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to