> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-08.txt > > My comment against your proposed fix (probably is/i.e.) is still > applicable to this version.
8.6 says "is probably a forgery" and includes at the end "(e.g., a message that is also DKIM-signed by the same domain, and that signature validates)". Was that not it? (e.g. is more correct than i.e., I believe, since there could be other cases.) -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
